Still, immigration hot-button rhetoric shapes the political discourse in America, with the training of Trump establishing himself as one of the key proponents of stricter border control and measures aimed at preventing illegal immigration. With Trump having again thrust national security, border integrity, and the American economy back into the national discourse with his latest pronouncements on entry policy and the rescinding of certain immigration programs, these discussions seem far from over. In response to his words igniting the national debate, people search for hints as to what new twists his immigration story will take throughout the years.
Trump’s Approach to Border Security
For Trump, immigration has always prioritized national security and American hiring. From the very start of his 2015 candidacy, immigration reform has been a very pivotal part of his platform and campaign. His policies to curb illegal immigration practiced by the family-separating “zero tolerance” approach at the southern border, as well as fencing up the border with a wall, came to symbolize his administration’s hard line.
Recently, Trump has further reiterated his call for stronger protective measures at the U.S. border in speeches and public addresses. He writes that illegal immigration is a national security threat in the sense that it puts Americans at risk of injury or harm. His speech cites minors in the realm of free passage across U.S. borders as an incursion against America–shackling national security, public resources, and elevating crime levels within borders. Trump further notes the need for tough and comprehensive vetting processes since strict entry policies keep criminal and criminal elements alike from entering the United States.
This is a similar sentiment to what Trump stated during his presidency. His case for comprehensive immigration reform bears exactly the same weight today, but only on the condition that U.S. borders function properly, and immigration laws are strictly adhered to.
Calls for Suspension of Immigration Programs
Recently, Trump has drawn parts of his early calls for certain immigration programs, suspension, including the Diversity Visa Lottery and family reunification visas position. Their positions were clearly stated as, “He says they invite people into the U.S. without testing their skills so that the immigrant can enhance the economy and live a good life in society.
Centering his arguments against the suspension of such programs, Trump seeks to invite workers skilled in what is required for immediate contributions to the workforce. He proposes a merit- based immigration system in which education, specialized skills, and experience would be ranked better than other immigration pathways. He further went on to criticize. He availed criticisms on chain migration, which allows U.S. citizens to sponsor relatives to come along into the U.S.; thus, chaining immigration is ripe for abuse.
His calls for suspension and reform have gained traction among his political base, especially among those who argue that the current immigration policies favor disproportionately anybody who happens to be coming from countries where they don’t offer the same economic or security advantages as any of those in Europe or North America. Trump consistently portrays his proposals as a necessary step in putting America first and offers America something that serves the best interest of immigration.
The Impact of Trump’s Words on Current Immigration Policy
Trump’s words have undoubtedly contributed to the formation of the current atmosphere post-presidency actively. Currently, a mandate by president Joe Biden has ordered a rollback of much of Trump’s highly provocative immigration policies, including the so-called Muslim ban, the family separation policies, and the construction of the border wall. Trump continues to find resonance from many sectors of the American electorate.
Given the present frustrations on the southern border regarding immigration, entry policies and suspension of immigration development become ever so important with ever-increasing migration entering the United States along with debates on resettling Afghan immigrants due to the U.S. withdrawal, focusing the discussion on just what policies are going to provide security for the nation and properly protect its economic dependence.
As Trump has specialized in suspending select immigration programs and tightening entry standards, in concert with tightening immigration standards has widened divergent views on immigration policy management. Supporters contend that suspending some immigrant programs would protect American jobs, conserve national cultural identities, and protect national security, while critics say the same policy allowing such suspensions would hurt many vulnerable populations, threaten diversity in the country, and would not address the underlying causes of immigration, namely, in many instances, poverty, violence, and instability in the population-producing countries.
Trump has changed the game for Republicans on immigration.
He certainly bolstered the contention that this “America First” agenda is still one of the major talking points in the lengthening debate over border control and immigration reform. While other Republican lawmakers may have taken the moderate stance on immigration over the years, Trump’s rhetoric has forced the hand of the party towards some type of returns to restrictionism.
This campaign season, immigration will undoubtedly rank among the most important issues to be addressed. While Trump has hinted at running, he may likely dominate the headlines with his remarks about immigration reform. The current debate is whether the Republican Party will be willing to follow a similar line, but he is certainly in a key position that influences public perception.
Conclusion
This concurs in the sentiment and tendency towards speaking in different tones, but it favors abolishing the immigration process altogether. While Trump has raised a lot of eyebrows with his statements on entry policy and suspension of immigration programs, his proposals appealed to many in the American public who sought more stringent border control and merit-based immigration, whereas others fought against this train of thought proposing and fighting for more inclusive and humane immigration policies.
With increasing evolution in immigration dialogue, balancing the issues of national interests and values against openness to new Americans, secular humanism, and prosperity, has made the balancing of the needs of the nation’s borders with the need to be true to the ideals of welcoming foreigners, serving humanitarian ends, and prosperity problematic. By Trump’s own pronouncements, it seems that on any immigration debate, at least for the foreseeable time, there are likely to be only finger-pointing contests in the American political sphere.
LrTvpoSX iBBt uQTdM oribC SBva ynEEsud LRyCSoo